kernel list a écrit :
My understanding is that get_vm_area_node etc. can't be called in
interrupt context because vmlist_lock is obtained with read_lock /
write_lock. I am wondering if it makes sense to use read_lock_bh /
write_lock_bh so that get_vm_area_node can be called in soft interrupt
context. All the code executed when holding vmlist_lock is walking
through the list, so it shouldn't change the behavior. If it does make
sense, BUG_ON(in_interrupt()) can be changed to BUG_ON(in_irq()).
Maybe it is just me, but I like to know people names.
Or maybe your name really is kernel list ?
I wonder why a soft irq would want to lookup vm areas.
(since vmalloc() from soft irq is *really* forbiden)
Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
