From: J.Bruce Fields <[email protected]>
There's no point deferring something just to immediately fail the deferral,
especially now that we can do something more useful in the failure case by
returning an error.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <[email protected]>
### Diffstat output
./net/sunrpc/cache.c | 20 +++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff .prev/net/sunrpc/cache.c ./net/sunrpc/cache.c
--- .prev/net/sunrpc/cache.c 2006-12-08 12:09:12.000000000 +1100
+++ ./net/sunrpc/cache.c 2006-12-08 12:09:26.000000000 +1100
@@ -530,6 +530,13 @@ static int cache_defer_req(struct cache_
struct cache_deferred_req *dreq;
int hash = DFR_HASH(item);
+ if (cache_defer_cnt >= DFR_MAX) {
+ /* too much in the cache, randomly drop this one,
+ * or continue and drop the oldest below
+ */
+ if (net_random()&1)
+ return -ETIMEDOUT;
+ }
dreq = req->defer(req);
if (dreq == NULL)
return -ETIMEDOUT;
@@ -548,17 +555,8 @@ static int cache_defer_req(struct cache_
/* it is in, now maybe clean up */
dreq = NULL;
if (++cache_defer_cnt > DFR_MAX) {
- /* too much in the cache, randomly drop
- * first or last
- */
- if (net_random()&1)
- dreq = list_entry(cache_defer_list.next,
- struct cache_deferred_req,
- recent);
- else
- dreq = list_entry(cache_defer_list.prev,
- struct cache_deferred_req,
- recent);
+ dreq = list_entry(cache_defer_list.prev,
+ struct cache_deferred_req, recent);
list_del(&dreq->recent);
list_del(&dreq->hash);
cache_defer_cnt--;
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
