wake_up's implementation does an implicit memory barrier and I think
that's the only sane semantics as the caller shouldn't have to worry.
So this write memory barrier is useless.
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <[email protected]>
diff --git a/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_super.c b/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_super.c
index b93265b..33800c7 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_super.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_super.c
@@ -553,7 +553,6 @@ vfs_sync_worker(
error = bhv_vfs_sync(vfsp, SYNC_FSDATA | SYNC_BDFLUSH | \
SYNC_ATTR | SYNC_REFCACHE, NULL);
vfsp->vfs_sync_seq++;
- wmb();
wake_up(&vfsp->vfs_wait_single_sync_task);
}
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
