Re: gen_pool_destroy(...)?

>>>>> "Komal" == Komal Shah <[email protected]> writes:

Komal> Hi, Why we don't have gen_pool_destroy(...) like
Komal> mempool_destroy(...)? As of now I can only see the application
Komal> of genalloc function in ia64/uncached.c file only.

Well, we didn't need it so it wasn't considered. I don't see any
reason why it couldn't be added.

Cheers,
Jes
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • gen_pool_destroy(...)?
    • From: "Komal Shah" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [patch] x86_64: do not enable the NMI watchdog by default
• Next by Date: [patch] net: dev_watchdog() locking fix
• Previous by thread: gen_pool_destroy(...)?
• Next by thread: [take25 0/6] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]