Re: gen_pool_destroy(...)?

>>>>> "Komal" == Komal Shah <[email protected]> writes:

Komal> Hi, Why we don't have gen_pool_destroy(...) like
Komal> mempool_destroy(...)? As of now I can only see the application
Komal> of genalloc function in ia64/uncached.c file only.

Well, we didn't need it so it wasn't considered. I don't see any
reason why it couldn't be added.

Cheers,
Jes
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- gen_pool_destroy(...)?
  - From: "Komal Shah" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [patch] x86_64: do not enable the NMI watchdog by default
Next by Date: [patch] net: dev_watchdog() locking fix
Previous by thread: gen_pool_destroy(...)?
Next by thread: [take25 0/6] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]