Re: [PATCH] Export current_is_keventd() for libphy

[Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>]

On Thu, 7 Dec 2006, Andrew Morton wrote:
> 
> We _can_ trust it in the context of
> 
> 	void flush_work(struct work_struct *work)

Yes, but the way the bits are defined, the "pending" bit is not meaningful 
as a synchronization event, for example - because _other_ users can't 
trust it once they've dispatched the function. So even in the synchronous 
run/flush_scheduled_work() kind of situation, you end up having to work 
with the fact that nobody _else_ can rely on the data structures, and that 
they are designed to work that way..

> ho-hum.  I'll take a look at turning that into something which compiles,
> then I'll convert a few oft-used flush_scheduled_work() callers over to use
> it.  To do this on a sensible timescale perhaps means that we should export
> current_is_keventd(), get the howling hordes off our backs.

Well, I simply committed my work that doesn't guarantee synchronization - 
the synchronization can now be added in kernel/workqueue.c any way we 
want. It's better than what we used to have, for sure, in both compiling 
and solving the practical problem, but also as a "go forward" point.

			Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/