Re: [PATCH] WorkStruct: Implement generic UP cmpxchg() where an arch doesn't support it

On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 07:47:22PM +0000, David Howells wrote:

> > > Pre-v6 ARM doesn't support SMP according to ARM's atomic.h,
> > 
> > That's not quite true, there exist ARMv5 processors that in theory
> > can support SMP.
> 
> I meant that the Linux ARM arch doesn't support it:

Ah, yes, not currently.  That's true.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- Re: [PATCH] WorkStruct: Implement generic UP cmpxchg() where an arch doesn't support it
  - From: Lennert Buytenhek <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] WorkStruct: Implement generic UP cmpxchg() where an arch doesn't support it
  - From: David Howells <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] WorkStruct: Implement generic UP cmpxchg() where an arch doesn't support it
  - From: David Howells <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: BUG? atleast >=2.6.19-rc5, x86 chroot on x86_64
Next by Date: Re: Linux should define ENOTSUP
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] WorkStruct: Implement generic UP cmpxchg() where an arch doesn't support it
Next by thread: Areca driver 2.6.19 on x86_64
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]