Re: [PATCH] WorkStruct: Implement generic UP cmpxchg() where an arch doesn't support it

On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 07:47:22PM +0000, David Howells wrote:

> > > Pre-v6 ARM doesn't support SMP according to ARM's atomic.h,
> > 
> > That's not quite true, there exist ARMv5 processors that in theory
> > can support SMP.
> 
> I meant that the Linux ARM arch doesn't support it:

Ah, yes, not currently.  That's true.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: [PATCH] WorkStruct: Implement generic UP cmpxchg() where an arch doesn't support it
    • From: Lennert Buytenhek <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH] WorkStruct: Implement generic UP cmpxchg() where an arch doesn't support it
    • From: David Howells <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] WorkStruct: Implement generic UP cmpxchg() where an arch doesn't support it
    • From: David Howells <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: BUG? atleast >=2.6.19-rc5, x86 chroot on x86_64
• Next by Date: Re: Linux should define ENOTSUP
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] WorkStruct: Implement generic UP cmpxchg() where an arch doesn't support it
• Next by thread: Areca driver 2.6.19 on x86_64
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]