Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> wrote: > test_bit() with a constant number is done very much in C, and very much on > purpose. _Exactly_ to allow the compiler to combine these kinds of things. Ah... I've read that several times, and each time I've assumed it's referring to *addr not nr as being constant. David - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: [PATCH] Export current_is_keventd() for libphy
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
- Re: [PATCH] Export current_is_keventd() for libphy
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
- [PATCH] Export current_is_keventd() for libphy
- From: Ben Collins <ben.collins@ubuntu.com>
- Re: [PATCH] Export current_is_keventd() for libphy
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
- Re: [PATCH] Export current_is_keventd() for libphy
- From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org>
- Re: [PATCH] Export current_is_keventd() for libphy
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
- Re: [PATCH] Export current_is_keventd() for libphy
- From: Andy Fleming <afleming@freescale.com>
- Re: [PATCH] Export current_is_keventd() for libphy
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
- Re: [PATCH] Export current_is_keventd() for libphy
- From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>
- Re: [PATCH] Export current_is_keventd() for libphy
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
- Re: [PATCH] Export current_is_keventd() for libphy
- From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org>
- Re: [PATCH] Export current_is_keventd() for libphy
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
- Re: [PATCH] Export current_is_keventd() for libphy
- From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
- Re: [PATCH] Export current_is_keventd() for libphy
- Prev by Date: Re: Change x86 prefix order
- Next by Date: Re: Subtleties of __attribute__((packed))
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Export current_is_keventd() for libphy
- Next by thread: RE: la la la la ... swappiness
- Index(es):
![]() |