Re: [PATCH 0/3] New firewire stack

Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Dec 2006, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
>> I personally would go with
>> "ieee1394", because that is the official name for it. Otherwise go with
>> "firewire" if you wanna separate yourself from the previous stack.
> 
> Which still leaves the opportunity for having a third stack in drivers/ilink
> :-)

Wait for the real one, to appear in drivers/high_performance_serial_bus.
-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-=-==- ==-- --==-
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH 0/3] New firewire stack
    • From: "Kristian Høgsberg" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/3] New firewire stack
    • From: Marcel Holtmann <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/3] New firewire stack
    • From: Kristian Høgsberg <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/3] New firewire stack
    • From: Marcel Holtmann <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/3] New firewire stack
    • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Subtleties of __attribute__((packed))
• Next by Date: RFC [PATCH] 2/2 disable initramfs
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/3] New firewire stack
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/3] New firewire stack
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]