On Wed, 6 Dec 2006, Li Yu wrote:
> 1. Make hidinput_disconnect_core() be more robust, it can not
> break anything even failed to allocate device struct.
> 2. Thanks new input device driver API, we need not the extra code
> for support force-feed device yet, so say bye to
> CONFIG_HID_SIMPLE_FF.
> Is this ready to merge? or What still is problem in them? Thanks.
Hi,
actually, I have prepared patches to split the USBHID code in two parts -
generic HID, which could be hooked by transport-specific HID layers (USB,
Bluetooth).
I did not send them to lkml/linux-usb, as they are quite big (mainly
because a lot of code is being moved around). I am currently trying to
setup a git repository on kernel.org, hopefully kernel.org people will
react, so that the patches could be easily put into git repository and be
available for rewiew and easy merge. After that, they are planned to be
merged either into Greg's or Andrew's tree. I can send them to you if you
want.
Do you think that you could wait a little bit more, after the split has
been done? (it's currently planned approximately after 2.6.20-rc1). It
seems to me that your patches will apply almost cleanly on top of the
split patches (you will have to change the pathnames, of course).
Thanks,
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
