Re: Relative atime (was Re: What's in ocfs2.git)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wednesday 06 December 2006 05:58, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Mon, 4 Dec 2006 16:36:20 -0800 Valerie Henson
> > <[email protected]> wrote: Add "relatime" (relative atime)
> > support.  Relative atime only updates the atime if the previous atime is
> > older than the mtime or ctime. Like noatime, but useful for applications
> > like mutt that need to know when a file has been read since it was last
> > modified.
>
> That seems like a good idea.
>
> I found touch_atime() to be rather putrid, so I hacked it around a bit. 

I find this function full of tests...

> The end result:
>
> void touch_atime(struct vfsmount *mnt, struct dentry *dentry)
> {
> 	struct inode *inode = dentry->d_inode;
> 	struct timespec now;
>
> 	if (IS_RDONLY(inode))
> 		return;

While we are adding new tests, we could try to be smart here testing both 
MS_RDONLY and MS_NOATIME.

if (__IS_FLG(inode, MS_RDONLY | MS_NOATIME))
	return;

> 	if (inode->i_flags & S_NOATIME)
> 		return;

> 	if (inode->i_sb->s_flags & MS_NOATIME)
> 		return;
So that that one can be deleted.

>        if ((inode->i_sb->s_flags & MS_NODIRATIME) && S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode))
>                return;

	if (__IS_FLG(inode, MS_NODIRATIME) && S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode))
		return;

Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux