Re: [PATCH] let WARN_ON() output the condition

On Dec 6 2006 10:07, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
>i'll probably ack such a patch, it can be useful even when the line 
>number is unique: if someone reports a WARN_ON() from an old kernel i 
>dont have to dig up the exact source but can see it right from the 
>condition what happened. Useful redundancy in bug output can be quite 
>useful at times. Please post it and we'll see whether it's acceptable.
>

Or just make it a compile-time decision, so those who do not want the 5k
overhead do not get it.


	-`J'
-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] let WARN_ON() output the condition
    • From: Jiri Kosina <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] let WARN_ON() output the condition
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] let WARN_ON() output the condition
    • From: Jiri Kosina <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] let WARN_ON() output the condition
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] let WARN_ON() output the condition
    • From: Jiri Kosina <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] let WARN_ON() output the condition
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 2.6.19 2/3] sata_promise: new EH conversion
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2.6.19 2/3] sata_promise: new EH conversion
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] let WARN_ON() output the condition
• Next by thread: -rt tsc frequency check
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]