Re: Why SCSI module needed for PCI-IDE ATA only disks ?

Ed Sweetman wrote:

What's not a legitimate configuration is libata drivers, no low level scsi drivers, no ide drivers and no sd,sr,sg drivers. Yet, that is the configuration the kernel currently gives you. How is that more correct than any of the 3 solutions I have suggested?

You can't build libata without low-level SCSI drivers. CONFIG_ATA automatically selects CONFIG_SCSI.

--
Robert Hancock      Saskatoon, SK, Canada
To email, remove "nospam" from [email protected]
Home Page: http://www.roberthancock.com/


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Why SCSI module needed for PCI-IDE ATA only disks ?
    • From: Ed Sweetman <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: Why SCSI module needed for PCI-IDE ATA only disks ?
    • From: Robert Hancock <[email protected]>
  • Re: Why SCSI module needed for PCI-IDE ATA only disks ?
    • From: Ed Sweetman <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH] nbd: show nbd client pid in sysfs
• Next by Date: [PATCH] Convert pxaficp_ir.c to platform_driver
• Previous by thread: Re: Why SCSI module needed for PCI-IDE ATA only disks ?
• Next by thread: Re: Why SCSI module needed for PCI-IDE ATA only disks ?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]