Re: [PATCH] Export current_is_keventd() for libphy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Dec 5, 2006, at 11:48, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:


 Essentially there is a race when disconnecting from a PHY, because
interrupt delivery uses the event queue for processing. The function to
handle interrupts that is called from the event queue is phy_change().
It takes a pointer to a structure that is associated with the PHY. At the
time phy_stop_interrupts() is called there may be one or more calls to
phy_change() still pending on the event queue. They may not be able to be processed until the structure passed to phy_change() have been freed, at
which point calling the function is wrong.

 One way of avoiding it is calling flush_scheduled_work() from
phy_stop_interrupts().  This is fine as long as a caller of
phy_stop_interrupts() (not necessarily the immediate one calling into
libphy) does not hold the netlink lock.

 If a caller indeed holds the netlink lock, then a driver effectively
calling phy_stop_interrupts() may arrange for the function to be itself scheduled through the event queue. This has the effect of avoiding the race as well, as the queue is processed in order, except it causes more hassle for the driver. Hence the choice was left to the driver's author -- if a driver "knows" the netlink lock is not going to be held at that point, it may call phy_stop_interrupts() directly, otherwise it shall use
the event queue.


We need to make sure there are no more pending phy_change() invocations in the work queue, this is true, however I'm not convinced that this avoids the problem. And now that I come back to this email after Linus's response, let me add that I agree with his suggestion. I still don't think it solves the original problem, though. Unless I'm missing something, Maciej's suggested fix (having the driver invoke phy_stop_interrupts() from a work queue) doesn't stop the race:

* Schedule stop_interrupts and freeing of memory.
* interrupt occurs, and schedules phy_change
* work_queue triggers, and stop_interrupts is invoked. It doesn't call flush_scheduled_work, because it's being called from keventd. * The invoker of stop_interrupts (presumably some function in the driver) frees up memory, including the phy_device. * phy_change is invoked() from the work queue, and starts accessing freed memory

Am I misunderstanding how work queues operate?

If I'm right, an ugly solution would have to disable the PHY interrupts before scheduling the cleanup. But is there really no way to tell the kernel to squash all pending work that came from *this* work_queue?




 With such an assumption in place the function has to check somehow
whether it has been scheduled through the queue or not and act
accordingly, which is why that "if" clause is there.

Now I gather the conclusion was the whole mess was going to be included
within libphy and not exposed to Ethernet MAC drivers.  This way the
library would schedule both phy_stop_interrupts() and mdiobus_unregister() (which is actually the function freeing the PHY device structure) through
the event queue as needed without a MAC driver having to know.


I suggested this, mostly so that drivers wouldn't have to be aware of this. But I'm not quite sure what happens when you unload a module. Does some stuff stay behind if needed? If you unload the ethernet driver, that will usually remove the bus controller for the PHY, which would prevent any scheduled code from accessing the PHY.


Andy


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux