Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
> Vladislav Bolkhovitin wrote:
>
>
>>Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>I have noticed that scsi_do_req has apparently been obsoleted in 2.6.18
>>>and above. Is scst and target support for FC-AL going to
>>>remain supported and/or merged at some point? If so, what is planned
>>>for scst support for later kernels?
>>>
>>>
>>
>>Jeff, I don't know why you ask here and not in scst-devel mailing list,
>>but SCST has beed updated to use scsi_execute_async() instead of
>>scsi_do_req() in 2.6.18+ for quite a while. Yes, scst is going to be
>>supported in the future.
>>
>>Vlad
>>
>>
>
> The code is not at sourceforge on your project site with these updates
> for 2.6.18. Where is the 2.6.18 version currently hosted?
It is there on http://sourceforge.net/projects/scst
(http://scst.sourceforge.net/). See 0.9.5 release version as well as
development code in the SVN.
Vlad
> P.S. I will post this to the scsi list in the future.
For scst only questions scst-devel on lists.sourceforge.net would be better.
> Thanks
>
> Jeff
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>>Jeff
>>>-
>>>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>>>the body of a message to [email protected]
>>>More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>>Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]