On Tue, 5 Dec 2006, Mel Gorman wrote: > That is one possibility. There are people working on fake nodes for containers > at the moment. If that pans out, the infrastructure would be available to > create one node per DIMM. Right that is a hack in use for one project. We would be adding huge amounts of VM overhead if we do a node per DIMM. So a desktop system with two dimms is to be treated like a NUMA system? Or how else do we deal with the multitude of load balancing situations that the additional nodes will generate? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- [PATCH] Add __GFP_MOVABLE for callers to flag allocations that may be migrated
- From: [email protected] (Mel Gorman)
- Re: [PATCH] Add __GFP_MOVABLE for callers to flag allocations that may be migrated
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Add __GFP_MOVABLE for callers to flag allocations that may be migrated
- From: Mel Gorman <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Add __GFP_MOVABLE for callers to flag allocations that may be migrated
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Add __GFP_MOVABLE for callers to flag allocations that may be migrated
- From: [email protected] (Mel Gorman)
- Re: [PATCH] Add __GFP_MOVABLE for callers to flag allocations that may be migrated
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Add __GFP_MOVABLE for callers to flag allocations that may be migrated
- From: Mel Gorman <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Add __GFP_MOVABLE for callers to flag allocations that may be migrated
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Add __GFP_MOVABLE for callers to flag allocations that may be migrated
- From: Mel Gorman <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Add __GFP_MOVABLE for callers to flag allocations that may be migrated
- From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Add __GFP_MOVABLE for callers to flag allocations that may be migrated
- From: Mel Gorman <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] Add __GFP_MOVABLE for callers to flag allocations that may be migrated
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 04/13] Connection Manager
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/3] New firewire stack
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Add __GFP_MOVABLE for callers to flag allocations that may be migrated
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Add __GFP_MOVABLE for callers to flag allocations that may be migrated
- Index(es):
 |