Re: /sys/bus/pci/drivers/<driver>/new_id

[Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>]

On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 09:18:04PM +0000, Russell King wrote:
> Unfortunately, the .../new_id feature does not work with the 8250_pci
> driver.
> 
> The reason for this comes down to the way .../new_id is implemented.
> When PCI tries to match a driver to a device, it checks the modules
> static device ID tables _before_ checking the dynamic new_id tables.
> 
> When a driver is capable of matching by ID, and falls back to matching
> by class (as 8250_pci does), this makes it absolutely impossible to
> specify a board by ID, and as such the correct driver_data value to
> use with it.
> 
> Let's say you have a serial board with vendor 0x1234 and device 0x5678.
> It's class is set to PCI_CLASS_COMMUNICATION_SERIAL.
> 
> On boot, this card is matched to the 8250_pci driver, which tries to
> probe it because it matched using the class entry.  The driver finds
> that it is unable to automatically detect the correct settings to use,
> so it returns -ENODEV.
> 
> You know that the information the driver needs is to match this card
> using a device_data value of '7'.  So you echo 1234 5678 0 0 0 0 7
> into new_id.
> 
> The kernel attempts to re-bind 8250_pci to this device.  However,
> because it scans the PCI driver tables, it _again_ matches the class
> entry which has the wrong device_data.  It fails.
> 
> End of story.  You can't support the card without rebuilding the
> kernel (or writing a specific PCI probe module to support it.)
> 
> So, can we make new_id override the driver-internal PCI ID tables?
> IOW, like this:

Yes, you are right, I'll add this to my queue.

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/