Hi,
On Monday 04 December 2006 16:39, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> there's *always* a way to do such things more cleanly - such as the
> patch below. Could you try to fix it up for 32-bit cycles_t platforms? I
> bet the hackery will be limited to now() and maybe the conversion
> routines, instead of spreading all around latency_trace.c.
While I'm not against this patch, but on m68k I prefer a 32bit cycle type
(however it's called), so it doesn't solve the original problem.
bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
