On Monday 04 December 2006 20:21, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> > > 2) NFS provides persistent storage.
> >
> > To me this sounds like a chicken and an egg problem. It
> > both depends and provides this at the same time :/. But
> > hey, if it's supposed to work then OK.
>
> ??? Locking depends on persistent storage, but persistent storage never
> depended on locking.
Except for the fact that to be able to mount anything RW you
generally _want_ to have locks. And can't have locks without
the mount. Not that it wouldn't work, it's just that I would
not do it [for obvious reasons].
> 2) No. The problem of client crashes was fixed in NFSv4 with the
> addition of lease-based locks.
This was NFSv3 system, so that would still be an issue.
--
// Janne
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
