Re: [PATCH] 2.6.18-rt7: fix more issues with 32-bit cycles_t in latency_trace.c (take 3)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


* Sergei Shtylyov <[email protected]> wrote:

>    What was the destiny of that patch? I haven't seen it accepted, 
> haven't seen any comments... while this is not a mere warning fix. 
> What am I expected to do to get it accepted -- recast it against 
> 2.6.19-rt1?

i'd suggest to redo it - but please keep it simple and clean. Those 
dozens of casts to u64 are quite ugly. Why is cycles_t 32-bits on some 
of the arches to begin with?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux