as a followup to my previous patch submission, is there any value to
the definition of "struct configfs_attribute" in configfs.h anymore,
given a similar structure in sysfs.h?
configfs.h:
-----------
struct configfs_attribute {
const char *ca_name;
struct module *ca_owner;
mode_t ca_mode;
};
sysfs.h:
--------
struct attribute {
const char * name;
struct module * owner;
mode_t mode;
};
if these two structs are *necessarily* identical, then it would make
sense to remove the few remaining uses of the former and replace them
with references to the latter, no? there are only a few files that
appear to still make reference to the former:
fs/configfs/inode.c
fs/ocfs2/cluster/heartbeat.c
fs/ocfs2/cluster/nodemanager.c
fs/dlm/config.c
so standardizing on the latter would be fairly easy. or is there a
reason why those two structures still have to be treated
independently?
rday
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
