> > It comes down to just what those guarantees GCC provides actually are.
> This is the first correct statement in your email. In any case the
> documented GCC guarantees have always been much stronger than you
> have been trying to persuade us they should be. I would argue that
> the C standard somewhat indirectly specifies those guarantees but I
> really don't have the heart for any more language-lawyering so I'm
> going to leave it at that.
I have tried to find any documentation of the guarantees gcc actually
provides and have been unable to do so. Where are these "documented GCC
guarantees" documented?
DS
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
