> > Does that change the fact it is ugly ? > > No, but it does beg the question "how else can it be done"? Agreed. > Distros need a way for users to add a fixed DSDT without recompiling > their own kernels. Legal rights to do so aside, do they ? and if they do does it have to be an ugly hack in the mainstream kernel. Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC] Include ACPI DSDT from INITRD patch into mainline
- From: Arkadiusz Miskiewicz <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] Include ACPI DSDT from INITRD patch into mainline
- References:
- [RFC] Include ACPI DSDT from INITRD patch into mainline
- From: Ben Collins <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] Include ACPI DSDT from INITRD patch into mainline
- From: Alan <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] Include ACPI DSDT from INITRD patch into mainline
- From: Ben Collins <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] Include ACPI DSDT from INITRD patch into mainline
- From: Alan <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] Include ACPI DSDT from INITRD patch into mainline
- From: Ben Collins <[email protected]>
- [RFC] Include ACPI DSDT from INITRD patch into mainline
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Fixed formatting in ia64_process_pending_irq()
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC] Include ACPI DSDT from INITRD patch into mainline
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC] Include ACPI DSDT from INITRD patch into mainline
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC] Include ACPI DSDT from INITRD patch into mainline
- Index(es):
 |