Re: [PATCH 0 of 2] Add memcpy_cachebypass, a memcpy that doesn't cache reads

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0 of 2] Add memcpy_cachebypass, a memcpy that doesn't cache reads
From: "Bryan O'Sullivan" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2006 09:13:11 -0800
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061107)

Andrew Morton wrote:

The name memcpy_cachebypass() doesn't tell us whether it bypasses caching
on the source, the dest or both.  It'd be nice if it did.

Yep, I'll fix that and resubmit.

   <b
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH 0 of 2] Add memcpy_cachebypass, a memcpy that doesn't cache reads
  - From: "Bryan O'Sullivan" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0 of 2] Add memcpy_cachebypass, a memcpy that doesn't cache reads
  - From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/4] [x86] Add command line option to enable/disable hyper-threading.
Next by Date: [RFC] timers, pointers to functions and type safety
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 0 of 2] Add memcpy_cachebypass, a memcpy that doesn't cache reads
Next by thread: [PATCH] netfilter: remove broken macro
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]

Powered by Linux