On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 15:32 +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> >
> > The idea is that we want our users to be able to use hyper-threading,
> > but we don't want it on by default.
>
> Hi,
>
> can I ask why not?
I'm just basing this on the history of the patch, which preceeds me, so
if this is incorrect, please don't blame me for misinformation :)
The original patch claims that hyper-threading opens the user up to some
sort of security risk involving hardware limitations in protecting
memory across the threads. I can't recall all the details.
If this is wrong, I'm more than happy to just drop the whole damn patch.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]