Re: [GFS2 & DLM] Guide to -nmw tree patches

[Vincent Legoll <legoll@online.fr>]

Proper email threading is important for web ML archives
too...

How does the attached read to a native english speaker ?

Suggestions to put that elsewhere, or better phrasing...

Or maybe, as per akpm's tpp document suggest, this
introductory emails should be forbidden^wdiscouraged,
and the text properly dispatched in the apropriate
changelogs ?

P.S.: I'm not subscribed, and couldn't find a way to do a
proper reply to Arjan's message, so, sorry to break the
proposed rule myself...

--
Vincent Legoll

Add a suggestion to properly thread patch series

Discussion started in thread form 2006-11-30:
Re: [GFS2 & DLM] Guide to -nmw tree patches

---
commit dbdb1b56acc95508e720ba6fb04ebf8c4a5089fd
tree 6ef01b1ae85c24cb2643ef4c1de541fbfb9b583d
parent 0215ffb08ce99e2bb59eca114a99499a4d06e704
author Vincent Legoll <vincent.legoll@gmail.com> Fri, 01 Dec 2006 00:03:46 +0100
committer Vincent Legoll <vincent.legoll@gmail.com> Fri, 01 Dec 2006 00:03:46 +0100

 Documentation/SubmittingPatches |    3 +++
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/SubmittingPatches b/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
index 302d148..00f96c7 100644
--- a/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
+++ b/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
@@ -116,6 +116,9 @@ in your patch description.
 If you cannot condense your patch set into a smaller set of patches,
 then only post say 15 or so at a time and wait for review and integration.
 
+If your patch set is not trivial, and you want to introduce the series
+with a presentation email, please post all the patches as a reply to that
+introduction, so that the whole email set is properly threaded.
 
 
 4) Select e-mail destination.