* David Miller <[email protected]> wrote:
> I want to point out something which is slightly misleading about this
> kind of analysis.
>
> Your disk I/O speed doesn't go down by a factor of 10 just because 9
> other non disk I/O tasks are running, yet for TCP that's seemingly OK
> :-)
disk I/O is typically not CPU bound, and i believe these TCP tests /are/
CPU-bound. Otherwise there would be no expiry of the timeslice to begin
with and the TCP receiver task would always be boosted to 'interactive'
status by the scheduler and would happily chug along at 500 mbits ...
(and i grant you, if a disk IO test is 20% CPU bound in process context
and system load is 10, then the scheduler will throttle that task quite
effectively.)
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
