On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 11:30:33AM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Nick Piggin <[email protected]> writes:
>
> > On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 11:15:39AM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> >> Nick Piggin <[email protected]> writes:
> >>
> >> > writev with a zero-length segment is a noop, and we shouldn't return EFAULT.
> >>
> >> AFAICS the callers of these functions never pass a zero length.
> >
> > They can in the case of a zero length write.
>
> How? All (indirect) callers I could find explicitly handle the
> zero-length case.
Sorry, zero length iov to writev (just had to double-check
there ;).
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
