On Wed, 2006-11-29 at 23:54 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> which is somewhat unpleasant. I added a WARN_ON(irqs_disabled()) to
> the
> out-of-line SMP version.
ok.
>
> btw, does anyone know why the SMP versions of this function use
> spin_lock_bh(&call_lock)?
that makes no sense (neither the get_cpu()/put_cpu() gymnastics) if this
is called with irqs disabled all the time.
Ingo
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
