Re: CPUFREQ-CPUHOTPLUG: Possible circular locking dependency

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Gautham R Shenoy <[email protected]> wrote:

> So do we
> - Rethink the strategy of per-subsystem hotcpu-locks ?
> 
>   OR
>   
> - Think of a way to straighten out the super-convoluted cpufreq code ?

i'm still wondering what the conceptual source of this fundamental 
locking complexity in cpufreq (and hotplug) is - it is not intuitive to 
me at all. Could you try to explain that?

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux