Could you mention changes in this patch since your last post ?
BTW, if I try to apply your patches, I get the following error (diffstat
works ok, but something has mangled the patch, maybe mailer problems ?)
patch: **** Only garbage was found in the patch input.
Regards
Suparna
On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 11:33:26AM +0100, Sébastien Dugué wrote:
> This patch adds POSIX listio completion notification support. It builds
> on support provided by the aio signal notification patch and adds an
> IOCB_CMD_GROUP command to io_submit().
>
> The purpose of IOCB_CMD_GROUP is to group together the following requests in
> the list up to the end of the list sumbitted to io_submit.
>
> As io_submit already accepts an array of iocbs, as part of listio submission,
> the user process prepends to a list of requests an empty special aiocb with
> an aio_lio_opcode of IOCB_CMD_GROUP, filling only the aio_sigevent fields.
>
>
> An IOCB_CMD_GROUP is added to the IOCB_CMD enum in include/linux/aio_abi.h
>
> A struct lio_event is added in include/linux/aio.h
>
> A struct lio_event *ki_lio is added to struct iocb in include/linux/aio.h
>
> In io_submit(), upon detecting such an IOCB_CMD_GROUP marker iocb, an
> lio_event is created in lio_create() which contains the necessary information
> for signaling a thread (signal number, pid, notify type and value) along with
> a count of requests attached to this event.
>
> The following depicts the lio_event structure:
>
> struct lio_event {
> atomic_t lio_users;
> struct aio_notify lio_notify;
> };
>
> lio_users holds an atomic counter of the number of requests attached to this
> lio. It is incremented with each request submitted and decremented at each
> request completion. When the counter reaches 0, we send the notification.
>
> Each subsequent submitted request is attached to this lio_event by setting
> the request kiocb->ki_lio to that lio_event (in io_submit_one()) and
> incrementing the lio_users count.
>
> In aio_complete(), if the request is attached to an lio (ki_lio <> 0),
> then lio_check() is called to decrement the lio_users count and eventually
> signal the user process when all the requests in the group have completed.
>
>
> The IOCB_CMD_GROUP semantic is as follows:
>
> - if the associated sigevent is NULL then we want to group
> requests for the purpose of blocking on the group completion
> (LIO_WAIT sync behavior).
>
> - if the associated sigevent is valid (not NULL) then we want to
> group requests for the purpose of being notified upon that
> group of requests completion (LIO_NOWAIT async behaviour).
>
>
>
> fs/aio.c | 123 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> fs/compat.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
> include/linux/aio.h | 15 +++++
> include/linux/aio_abi.h | 1
> 4 files changed, 192 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> Signed-off-by: Sébastien Dugué <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <[email protected]>
>
> Index: linux-2.6.19-rc6-mm2/fs/aio.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.19-rc6-mm2.orig/fs/aio.c 2006-11-28 12:51:45.000000000
> +0100 +++ linux-2.6.19-rc6-mm2/fs/aio.c 2006-11-28 12:51:48.000000000
> +0100 @@ -414,6 +414,7 @@ static struct kiocb fastcall *__aio_get_
> req->ki_cancel = NULL;
> req->ki_retry = NULL;
> req->ki_dtor = NULL;
> + req->ki_lio = NULL;
> req->private = NULL;
> req->ki_iovec = NULL;
> req->ki_notify.sigq = NULL;
> @@ -1009,6 +1010,53 @@ out_unlock:
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> +void lio_check(struct lio_event *lio)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = atomic_dec_and_test(&lio->lio_users);
> +
> + if (unlikely(ret) && lio->lio_notify.notify != SIGEV_NONE) {
> + /* last one -> notify process */
> + aio_send_signal(&lio->lio_notify);
> + kfree(lio);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +struct lio_event *lio_create(struct sigevent __user *user_event)
> +{
> + int ret = 0;
> + struct lio_event *lio = NULL;
> +
> + lio = kzalloc(sizeof(*lio), GFP_KERNEL);
> +
> + if (!lio)
> + return ERR_PTR(-EAGAIN);
> +
> + /*
> + * Grab an initial ref on the lio to avoid races between
> + * submission and completion.
> + */
> + atomic_set(&lio->lio_users, 1);
> +
> + lio->lio_notify.notify = SIGEV_NONE;
> +
> + if (user_event) {
> + /*
> + * User specified an event for this lio,
> + * he wants to be notified upon lio completion.
> + */
> + ret = aio_setup_sigevent(&lio->lio_notify, user_event);
> +
> + if (ret) {
> + kfree(lio);
> + return ERR_PTR(ret);
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return lio;
> +}
> +
> /* aio_complete
> * Called when the io request on the given iocb is complete.
> * Returns true if this is the last user of the request. The
> @@ -1057,8 +1105,12 @@ int fastcall aio_complete(struct kiocb *
> * when the event got cancelled.
> */
> if (kiocbIsCancelled(iocb)) {
> + if (iocb->ki_lio)
> + lio_check(iocb->ki_lio);
> +
> if (iocb->ki_notify.sigq)
> sigqueue_free(iocb->ki_notify.sigq);
> +
> goto put_rq;
> }
>
> @@ -1099,6 +1151,9 @@ int fastcall aio_complete(struct kiocb *
> sigqueue_free(iocb->ki_notify.sigq);
> }
>
> + if (iocb->ki_lio)
> + lio_check(iocb->ki_lio);
> +
> pr_debug("%ld retries: %zd of %zd\n", iocb->ki_retried,
> iocb->ki_nbytes - iocb->ki_left, iocb->ki_nbytes);
> put_rq:
> @@ -1633,7 +1688,7 @@ static int aio_wake_function(wait_queue_
> }
>
> int fastcall io_submit_one(struct kioctx *ctx, struct iocb __user *user_iocb,
> - struct iocb *iocb)
> + struct iocb *iocb, struct lio_event *lio)
> {
> struct kiocb *req;
> struct file *file;
> @@ -1695,6 +1750,9 @@ int fastcall io_submit_one(struct kioctx
> goto out_put_req;
> }
>
> + /* Attach this iocb to its lio */
> + req->ki_lio = lio;
> +
> ret = aio_setup_iocb(req);
>
> if (ret)
> @@ -1738,6 +1796,8 @@ asmlinkage long sys_io_submit(aio_contex
> struct iocb __user * __user *iocbpp)
> {
> struct kioctx *ctx;
> + struct lio_event *lio = NULL;
> + int lio_wait = 0;
> long ret = 0;
> int i;
>
> @@ -1771,11 +1831,66 @@ asmlinkage long sys_io_submit(aio_contex
> break;
> }
>
> - ret = io_submit_one(ctx, user_iocb, &tmp);
> - if (ret)
> - break;
> + if (tmp.aio_lio_opcode == IOCB_CMD_GROUP) {
> +
> + /* this command means that all following IO commands
> + * are in the same group.
> + *
> + * Userspace either wants to be notified upon or block
> until
> + * completion of all the requests in the group.
> + */
> + /*
> + * Ignore an IOCB_CMD_GROUP request if we are already
> + * processing one. This means only one listio per
> + * io_submit call.
> + */
> + if (lio)
> + continue;
> +
> + lio = lio_create((struct sigevent __user *)(unsigned
> long)
> + tmp.aio_sigeventp);
> +
> + ret = PTR_ERR(lio);
> +
> + if (IS_ERR(lio))
> + goto out_put_ctx;
> +
> + if (!tmp.aio_sigeventp)
> + lio_wait = 1;
> + } else {
> + if (lio)
> + atomic_inc(&lio->lio_users);
> +
> + ret = io_submit_one(ctx, user_iocb, &tmp, lio);
> +
> + if (ret) {
> + if (lio) {
> + /*
> + * If a request failed, just decrement
> + * the users count, but go on
> submitting
> + * subsequent requests.
> + */
> + atomic_dec(&lio->lio_users);
> + } else
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if (lio) {
> + /*
> + * Drop extra ref on the lio now that we're done submitting
> + * requests
> + */
> + lio_check(lio);
> +
> + if (lio_wait) {
> + wait_event(ctx->wait, atomic_read(&lio->lio_users)==0);
> + kfree(lio);
> + }
> }
>
> +out_put_ctx:
> put_ioctx(ctx);
> return i ? i : ret;
> }
> Index: linux-2.6.19-rc6-mm2/include/linux/aio_abi.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.19-rc6-mm2.orig/include/linux/aio_abi.h 2006-11-28
> 12:51:45.000000000 +0100 +++
> linux-2.6.19-rc6-mm2/include/linux/aio_abi.h 2006-11-28
> 12:51:48.000000000 +0100 @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ enum { IOCB_CMD_NOOP = 6,
> IOCB_CMD_PREADV = 7,
> IOCB_CMD_PWRITEV = 8,
> + IOCB_CMD_GROUP = 9,
> };
>
> /* read() from /dev/aio returns these structures. */
> Index: linux-2.6.19-rc6-mm2/include/linux/aio.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.19-rc6-mm2.orig/include/linux/aio.h 2006-11-28
> 12:51:45.000000000 +0100 +++ linux-2.6.19-rc6-mm2/include/linux/aio.h
> 2006-11-28 12:51:48.000000000 +0100 @@ -58,6 +58,11 @@ struct aio_notify {
> struct sigqueue *sigq;
> };
>
> +struct lio_event {
> + atomic_t lio_users;
> + struct aio_notify lio_notify;
> +};
> +
> /* is there a better place to document function pointer methods? */
> /**
> * ki_retry - iocb forward progress callback
> @@ -113,6 +118,9 @@ struct kiocb {
> wait_queue_t ki_wait;
> loff_t ki_pos;
>
> + /* lio this iocb might be attached to */
> + struct lio_event *ki_lio;
> +
> void *private;
> /* State that we remember to be able to restart/retry */
> unsigned short ki_opcode;
> @@ -220,12 +228,15 @@ struct mm_struct;
> extern void FASTCALL(exit_aio(struct mm_struct *mm));
> extern struct kioctx *lookup_ioctx(unsigned long ctx_id);
> extern int FASTCALL(io_submit_one(struct kioctx *ctx,
> - struct iocb __user *user_iocb, struct iocb *iocb));
> + struct iocb __user *user_iocb, struct iocb
> *iocb,
> + struct lio_event *lio));
>
> /* semi private, but used by the 32bit emulations: */
> struct kioctx *lookup_ioctx(unsigned long ctx_id);
> int FASTCALL(io_submit_one(struct kioctx *ctx, struct iocb __user *user_iocb,
> - struct iocb *iocb));
> + struct iocb *iocb, struct lio_event *lio));
> +struct lio_event *lio_create(struct sigevent __user *user_event);
> +void lio_check(struct lio_event *lio);
>
> #define get_ioctx(kioctx) do { \
> BUG_ON(atomic_read(&(kioctx)->users) <= 0); \
> Index: linux-2.6.19-rc6-mm2/fs/compat.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.19-rc6-mm2.orig/fs/compat.c 2006-11-28 12:51:45.000000000
> +0100 +++ linux-2.6.19-rc6-mm2/fs/compat.c 2006-11-28 12:51:48.000000000
> +0100 @@ -646,6 +646,8 @@ asmlinkage long
> compat_sys_io_submit(aio_context_t ctx_id, int nr, u32 __user *iocb)
> {
> struct kioctx *ctx;
> + struct lio_event *lio = NULL;
> + int lio_wait = 0;
> long ret = 0;
> int i;
>
> @@ -694,12 +696,66 @@ compat_sys_io_submit(aio_context_t ctx_i
> tmp.aio_sigeventp = (__u64)event;
> }
>
> - ret = io_submit_one(ctx, user_iocb, &tmp);
> + if (tmp.aio_lio_opcode == IOCB_CMD_GROUP) {
>
> - if (ret)
> - break;
> + /* this command means that all following IO commands
> + * are in the same group.
> + *
> + * Userspace either wants to be notified upon or block
> until
> + * completion of all the requests in the group.
> + */
> + /*
> + * Ignore an IOCB_CMD_GROUP request if we are already
> + * processing one. This means only one listio per
> + * io_submit call.
> + */
> + if (lio)
> + continue;
> +
> + lio = lio_create((struct sigevent __user *)(unsigned
> long)
> + tmp.aio_sigeventp);
> +
> + ret = PTR_ERR(lio);
> +
> + if (IS_ERR(lio))
> + goto out_put_ctx;
> +
> + if (!tmp.aio_sigeventp)
> + lio_wait = 1;
> + } else {
> + if (lio)
> + atomic_inc(&lio->lio_users);
> +
> + ret = io_submit_one(ctx, user_iocb, &tmp, lio);
> +
> + if (ret) {
> + if (lio) {
> + /*
> + * If a request failed, just decrement
> + * the users count, but go on
> submitting
> + * subsequent requests.
> + */
> + atomic_dec(&lio->lio_users);
> + } else
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if (lio) {
> + /*
> + * Drop extra ref on the lio now that we're done submitting
> + * requests
> + */
> + lio_check(lio);
> +
> + if (lio_wait) {
> + wait_event(ctx->wait, atomic_read(&lio->lio_users)==0);
> + kfree(lio);
> + }
> }
>
> +out_put_ctx:
> put_ioctx(ctx);
>
> return i? i: ret;
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-aio' in
> the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux AIO,
> see: http://www.kvack.org/aio/
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]";>[email protected]</a>
--
Suparna Bhattacharya ([email protected])
Linux Technology Center
IBM Software Lab, India
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
