On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 12:30:36AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 07:40:00 +0000
> Russell King <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Yet another attempt to get a response from Andrew. It is rather
> > important that you DO respond to this.
>
> You can read the code as easily as I can?
Sigh. Please don't cut the relevant part of my _first_ email message
where it can be clearly seen that I _have_ read the code and interpreted
it _differently_ from you.
> I'm not really sure what you're asking - I thought Mingming cleared
> things up.
Which message did this happen?
What I'm looking for is confirmation of the semantics of
find_next_zero_bit(), which is a fairly simple question to ask, and
certainly does not justify this rather obtuse and difficult thread.
<extremely frustrated>
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of:
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
