Re: Broken commit: [NETFILTER]: ipt_REJECT: remove largely duplicate route_reverse function

David Miller <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Longer term this is really messy, we should handle this some
> other way.

Definitely.  I'm not sure whether 48 is enough even for recursive
tunnels.  This should really just be a hint.  It's OK to spend a
bit of time reallocating skb's if it's too small, but it's not OK
to die.

Cheers,
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[email protected]>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Broken commit: [NETFILTER]: ipt_REJECT: remove largely duplicate route_reverse function
    • From: David Miller <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: Broken commit: [NETFILTER]: ipt_REJECT: remove largely duplicate route_reverse function
    • From: David Miller <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 3/4] sysctl: Simplify ipc ns specific sysctls
• Next by Date: Re: [patch 2.6.19-rc6] Stop gcc 4.1.0 optimizing wait_hpet_tick away
• Previous by thread: Re: Broken commit: [NETFILTER]: ipt_REJECT: remove largely duplicate route_reverse function
• Next by thread: Re: Broken commit: [NETFILTER]: ipt_REJECT: remove largely duplicate route_reverse function
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]