Re: [PATCH 1/2 -mm] fault-injection: safer defaults, trivial optimization, cleanup

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 27 Nov 2006 23:44:26 -0800
Don Mullis <[email protected]> wrote:

> Set /debug/fail*/* defaults supposed most likely to please a new user.
> Clamp /debug/fail*/stacktrace-depth to MAX_STACK_TRACE_DEPTH.
> 
> In should_fail(), move stack-unwinding test past cheaper tests (performance
> gain not quantified).  Simplify logic; eliminate goto.
> Use bool/true/false consistently.
> 
> Correct and disambiguate documentation.

We'd prefer one-patch-per-concept, please. This all sounds like about
six patches.

We _could_ merge this patch as-is, but it means that when this stuff
finally hits mainline it would go in as a nice sequence of logical patches,
followed by a random thing which is splattered all over all the preceding
patches.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux