Re: [patch] x86_64: fix earlyprintk=...,keep regression

On Tue, 28 Nov 2006, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> Or is there some reason you really _want_ "keep" to be different? If so, 
> it should probably be commented on.

Hmm. Looking at the commit that broke, the "strstr()" was there 
originally, so in that sense your patch is obviously the minimal and safe 
one. So I'll apply it as-is after all, but I'd be even happier if somebody 
cleaned this up a bit and sent a patch after I do 2.6.19 (which may well 
be later today, I think the time has come).

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [patch] x86_64: fix earlyprintk=...,keep regression
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] x86_64: fix earlyprintk=...,keep regression
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [patch] x86_64: fix earlyprintk=...,keep regression
• Next by Date: Re: [patch] x86_64: fix earlyprintk=...,keep regression
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch] x86_64: fix earlyprintk=...,keep regression
• Next by thread: Re: [patch] x86_64: fix earlyprintk=...,keep regression
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]