Re: Adaptive readahead V16 benchmarks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/24/06, Fengguang Wu <[email protected]> wrote:
Andrew,

Here are some benchmarks for the latest adaptive readahead patchset.

Most benchmarks have 3+ runs and have the numbers averaged.
However some testing times are short and not quite stable.

Most of them are carried out on my PC:
        Seagate ST3250820A 250G/8M IDE disk, 512M Memory, AMD Sempron 2200+

Basic conclusions:
- equivalent performance in normal cases
- much better in: busy NFS server; sparse/backward reading
- adapts to memory size very well on randomly loading a file

These results look really good, and the code seems to be at least as
well-structured as the previous code.  I think this argues for
inclusion.

NATE
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux