On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 08:03:01PM +0100, Olivier Galibert wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 08:28:04PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > On Sunday 26 November 2006 14:15, Olivier Galibert wrote:
> > > Ok, here you go, what about that? I'll be able to test it on i386 on
> > > monday, not before. It's hard to doa full 32bits install remotely :-)
> >
> > Sorry, please don't put it all into a single patch. Do one patch
> > that just moves code, then add new functionality later.
> > Otherwise nobody can review it properly.
>
> Ok, I have it split in 5 parts, but the testing on i386 failed simply
> because the vanilla code there just does not work. Symptom is the
> SATA driver not seeing the disk somehow.
Weird. That shouldn't happen.
Is that with just the code movement patch or your feature patch
added too? If the later can you test it with only code movement
(and compare against vanilla kernel). at least code movement
only should behave exactly the same as unpatched kernel.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
