On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 10:04 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 05:34:47PM -0800, Rohit Seth wrote:
> > Fix the existing numa=fake so that ioholes are appropriately configured.
> > Currently machines that have sizeable IO holes don't work with
> > numa=fake>4. This patch tries to equally partition the total available
> > memory in equal size chunk. The minimum size of the fake node is set to
> > 32MB.
>
> This patch seems to do far more than advertised in the change log?
>
> You're conflicting badly with Amul's numa hash function rewrite for example.
>
Both of these patches are mucking with hash function and
populate_memnodemap. I like Amul's approach of doing dynamic allocation
of numa hash map so that it can support >64GB of memory space. I will
resend the patches on top of his patch (incorporating your other
feedback).
-rohit
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
