Re: [PATCH] paravirt reorder functions to avoid unspecified behaviour

Andy Whitcroft <[email protected]> writes:

> paravirt: reorder functions to avoid unspecified behaviour
> 
> The paravirt ops introduce a 'weak' attribute onto memory_setup().
> Code ordering leads to the following warnings on x86:
> 
>     arch/i386/kernel/setup.c:651: warning: weak declaration of
> 		`memory_setup' after first use results in unspecified behavior
> 
> Move memory_setup() to avoid this.

I added the patch to the original patch thanks

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • 2.6.19-rc6-mm1
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH] paravirt reorder functions to avoid unspecified behaviour
    • From: Andy Whitcroft <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Weird wasting of time between ioctl() and ioctl dispatcher
• Next by Date: Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] i386: always enable regparm
• Previous by thread: [PATCH] paravirt reorder functions to avoid unspecified behaviour
• Next by thread: BUG: 2.6.19-rc6 net/irda/irlmp.c
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]