On Sun, 2006-11-26 at 17:38 -0800, Don Mullis wrote:
> > This must be a bisection false positive. The patch in question is
> > essentially a no-op for a UP kernel.
Duh! Except for the bug, which doesn't care either way.
> Testing alternately with
> 1) all -mm1 patches applied, and
> 2) all except sched-improve-migration-accuracy*.path applied,
> confirms the misbehavior.
While fixing a sched_time accounting buglet, I stupidly broke sleep_avg
accounting, and quite thoroughly for cpu hogs. Since I updated a task's
timestamp at tick time, but sleep_avg adjustment only takes place at
schedule time, every tick a task took without scheduling resulted in a
tick of run time lost for sleep_avg accounting. The below should fix
it, can you confirm?
Fix sleep_avg breakage induced by sched-improve-migration-accuracy.path
Use p->last_ran to fix sched_time buglet instead of p->timestamp.
Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <[email protected]>
--- linux-2.6.19-rc6-mm1/kernel/sched.c.org 2006-11-27 10:24:07.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.19-rc6-mm1/kernel/sched.c 2006-11-27 10:28:59.000000000 +0100
@@ -3024,8 +3024,8 @@ EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL(kstat);
static inline void
update_cpu_clock(struct task_struct *p, struct rq *rq, unsigned long long now)
{
- p->sched_time += now - p->timestamp;
- p->timestamp = rq->most_recent_timestamp = now;
+ p->sched_time += now - p->last_ran;
+ p->last_ran = rq->most_recent_timestamp = now;
}
/*
@@ -3038,7 +3038,7 @@ unsigned long long current_sched_time(co
unsigned long flags;
local_irq_save(flags);
- ns = p->sched_time + sched_clock() - p->timestamp;
+ ns = p->sched_time + sched_clock() - p->last_ran;
local_irq_restore(flags);
return ns;
@@ -3553,10 +3553,11 @@ switch_tasks:
prev->sleep_avg -= run_time;
if ((long)prev->sleep_avg <= 0)
prev->sleep_avg = 0;
+ prev->timestamp = prev->last_ran = now;
sched_info_switch(prev, next);
if (likely(prev != next)) {
- next->timestamp = prev->last_ran = now;
+ next->timestamp = now;
rq->nr_switches++;
rq->curr = next;
++*switch_count;
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
