Re: [2.6 patch] better CONFIG_W1_SLAVE_DS2433_CRC handling

On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 02:35:03AM +0100, Adrian Bunk ([email protected]) wrote:
> CONFIG_W1_SLAVE_DS2433_CRC can be used directly, there's no reason for 
> the indirection of defining a different variable in the Makefile.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>

I will add apply this patch, thanks Adrian.

-- 
	Evgeniy Polyakov
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [2.6 patch] better CONFIG_W1_SLAVE_DS2433_CRC handling
    • From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Forgotten patch to fs/locks.c
• Next by Date: Re: [2.6 patch] NET_SCH_ATM doesn't need ipcommon.o
• Previous by thread: [2.6 patch] better CONFIG_W1_SLAVE_DS2433_CRC handling
• Next by thread: [2.6 patch] kill net/rxrpc/rxrpc_syms.c
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]