On Sat, 2006-11-25 at 18:12 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Hm, could you please file a bugzilla report regarding the serial console for > the information of its maintainer(s)? Yeah, I'll rummage around a bit first though. -Mike - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] PM: suspend/resume debugging should depend on SOFTWARE_SUSPEND
- From: Mike Galbraith <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] PM: suspend/resume debugging should depend on SOFTWARE_SUSPEND
- References:
- [patch] PM: suspend/resume debugging should depend on SOFTWARE_SUSPEND
- From: Chuck Ebbert <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] PM: suspend/resume debugging should depend on SOFTWARE_SUSPEND
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] PM: suspend/resume debugging should depend on SOFTWARE_SUSPEND
- From: Mike Galbraith <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] PM: suspend/resume debugging should depend on SOFTWARE_SUSPEND
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
- [patch] PM: suspend/resume debugging should depend on SOFTWARE_SUSPEND
- Prev by Date: [RFC: 2.6 patch] i386: always enable regparm
- Next by Date: [2.6 patch] remove fs/jffs2/ioctl.c
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch] PM: suspend/resume debugging should depend on SOFTWARE_SUSPEND
- Next by thread: Re: [patch] PM: suspend/resume debugging should depend on SOFTWARE_SUSPEND
- Index(es):
 |