Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86-64: calling clear_bss before set_intr_gate with early_idt_handler

"Yinghai Lu" <[email protected]> writes:

> Please check the patch.
>
> [PATCH] x86_64: clear_bss before set_intr_gate with early_idt_handler
> idt_table is in the .bss section, so clear_bss need to called at first
>
> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <[email protected]> 

Acked-by: Eric Biederman <[email protected]>

The only problem I have might be the description would read more
clearly as:
 [PATCH] x86_64: call clear_bss before set_intr_gate with early_idt_handler

 idt_table is in the .bss section, so clear_bss need to called first

Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH 1/2] x86-64: calling clear_bss before set_intr_gate with early_idt_handler
  - From: "Yinghai Lu" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Adaptive readahead V16 benchmarks
Next by Date: [PATCH v2] libsas: Don't give scsi_cmnds to the EH if they never made it to the SAS LLDD or have already returned
Previous by thread: [PATCH 1/2] x86-64: calling clear_bss before set_intr_gate with early_idt_handler
Next by thread: [PATCH 2/2] x86-64: change the size for interrupt array to NR_VECTORS
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]