On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 07:14:06PM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov (johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru) wrote:
> If kernel has put data asynchronously it will setup special flag, thus
> kevent_wait() will not sleep and will return, so thread will check new
> entries and process them.
For the clarification - only kevent_wait() updates index, userspace
will not detect that it has changed after thread has put there new
data.
In case kernel thread will updated index too, you are correct,
kevent_wait() should get index as parameter.
--
Evgeniy Polyakov
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]