>From 3c3afe3964bf1259e172e5a8a096a0695897af62 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Teigland <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 09:49:02 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] [DLM] res_recover_locks_count not reset when recover_locks is aborted
Red Hat BZ 213684
If a node sends an lkb to the new master (RCOM_LOCK message) during
recovery and recovery is then aborted on both nodes before it gets a
reply, the res_recover_locks_count needs to be reset to 0 so that when the
subsequent recovery comes along and sends the lkb to the new master again
the assertion doesn't trigger that checks that counter is zero.
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <[email protected]>
---
fs/dlm/recover.c | 1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/dlm/recover.c b/fs/dlm/recover.c
index a5e6d18..cf9f683 100644
--- a/fs/dlm/recover.c
+++ b/fs/dlm/recover.c
@@ -252,6 +252,7 @@ static void recover_list_clear(struct dl
spin_lock(&ls->ls_recover_list_lock);
list_for_each_entry_safe(r, s, &ls->ls_recover_list, res_recover_list) {
list_del_init(&r->res_recover_list);
+ r->res_recover_locks_count = 0;
dlm_put_rsb(r);
ls->ls_recover_list_count--;
}
--
1.4.1
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
