Re: [PATCH 2.6.19] ehca: bug fix: use wqe offset instead wqe address to determine pending work requests

Hi Roland!
> OK.  After thinking about this, I'm going to queue it for 2.6.20 --
> we're _way_ too close to the 2.6.19 final release to put in patches
> that aren't either small and obvious, or fix a problem someone hit in
> real life.
That's fair. I understand your decision. And thanks for queueing for
2.6.20. Can you please brief me on patch procedures for post-2.6.19?
Regards
Nam

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 2.6.19] ehca: bug fix: use wqe offset instead wqe address to determine pending work requests
    • From: Roland Dreier <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: [PATCH 2.6.19] ehca: bug fix: use wqe offset instead wqe address to determine pending work requests
    • From: Roland Dreier <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH] Fix bug where early_node_map[] is not sorted before use
• Next by Date: Re: [discuss] 2.6.19-rc6: known regressions (v4)
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2.6.19] ehca: bug fix: use wqe offset instead wqe address to determine pending work requests
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 2.6.19] ehca: bug fix: use wqe offset instead wqe address to determine pending work requests
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]