Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 4/13] BC: context handling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/23/06, Pavel Emelianov <[email protected]> wrote:
You mean moving is like this:

old_bc = task->real_bc;
task->real_bc = new_bc;
cmpxchg(&tsk->exec_bc, old_bc, new_bc);

? Then this won't work:

Initialisation:
current->exec_bc = init_bc;
current->real_bc = init_bc;
...
IRQ:
current->exec_bc = init_bc;
...
                             old_bc = tsk->real_bc; /* init_bc */
                             tsk->real_bc = bc1;
                             cx(tsk->exec_bc, init_bc, bc1); /* ok */
...
Here at the middle of an interrupt
we have bc1 set as exec_bc on task
which IS wrong!

You could get round that by having a separate "irq_bc" that's never
valid for a task not in an interrupt.

Paul
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux