On Thu, 23 Nov 2006 04:51:56 +0900
OGAWA Hirofumi <[email protected]> wrote:
> The both of patch and option should be needed. Because the following
> filename is not shortname, shortname option doesn't affect.
>
> If you test shortname=winnt without patch, it should still show the
> problem of following filename, but it should be rare case though.
>
> Can you test it?
unfortunately not, the files have been renamed and renaming them back I can't reproduce the magical effect they did before.
Now I will try to rescan for any kind of files with long names and see if with the option on and without the patch it will re-generate that kind of errors they gave me.
I must thank you a lot, maybe a bottle of wine will do it ;)
anyway I didn't get why some files will copy with the right case and other don't. Was it a problem with the dentry table randomly failing in saving the filename? the shortname option in the Docs isn't well accurate in explaining the meaning of "Windows X rule for display/create", I will investigate after having checked the 32 GB of files. thanks again.
--
Matteo 'Peach' Pescarin
ICQ UIN = 71110111
Jabber ID = [email protected]
Web Site = http://www.smartart.it
GeCHI = http://www.gechi.it
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
