Re: [PATCH] X86_genericarch needs SMP?

On Wednesday 22 November 2006 18:48, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> From: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
> 
> With
> CONFIG_SMP=n, CONFIG_X86_GENERICARCH=y
> (and CONFIG_X86_SUMMIT=n), kernel build gets:
> 
> arch/i386/mach-generic/built-in.o: In function `apicid_to_node':
> summit.c:(.text+0x54): undefined reference to `apicid_2_node'
> 
> so should X86_GENERICARCH depend on SMP?
> or should there be more ifdefs in the source files?

I already fixed that here in a different way, but the patch didn't make 
it to Linus yet.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH] X86_genericarch needs SMP?
  - From: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: [PATCH] dont insert pipe dentries into dentry_hashtable.
Next by Date: [PATCH] [DCACHE] : avoid RCU for never hashed dentries
Previous by thread: [PATCH] X86_genericarch needs SMP?
Next by thread: mapping of pages out of upper 128MB into kernel address space
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]