On 11:42, Andi Kleen wrote: > ject : x86_64: Bad page state in process 'swapper' > > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/11/10/135 > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/11/10/208 > > Submitter : Andre Noll <[email protected]> > > Handled-By : David Rientjes <[email protected]> > > Status : problem is being debugged > > Does this still happen with -rc6? Unfortunately, yes. I tried rc6, current git, and currrent git + David Rientjes' patch. They all show the same behaviour. > It's probably another bug in the memmap parsing rewrite (Mel cc'ed) > but the debugging information in the standard kernel unfortunately > doesn't give enough output to find out where it happens. Feel free to send me a debugging patch.. Andre -- The only person who always got his work done by Friday was Robinson Crusoe
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [discuss] 2.6.19-rc6: known regressions (v4)
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: [discuss] 2.6.19-rc6: known regressions (v4)
- From: Mel Gorman <[email protected]>
- Re: [discuss] 2.6.19-rc6: known regressions (v4)
- References:
- Linux 2.6.19-rc6
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- 2.6.19-rc6: known regressions (v4)
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: [discuss] 2.6.19-rc6: known regressions (v4)
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Linux 2.6.19-rc6
- Prev by Date: Re: [OT] Re: bug? VFAT copy problem
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 4/5] e1000 : Make Intel e1000 driver legacy I/O port free
- Previous by thread: Re: [discuss] 2.6.19-rc6: known regressions (v4)
- Next by thread: Re: [discuss] 2.6.19-rc6: known regressions (v4)
- Index(es):
 |