On Fri, 17 Nov 2006, Haavard Skinnemoen wrote:
> Hmm...underruns as in "eth0: TX underrun, resetting buffers"?
Yes, that's the message.
> (...)
>
> If it's a problem with the descriptor, it would probably help to dump
> out some information about the ring state, i.e. the value of
> bp->tx_head and bp->tx_tail, and maybe dump all outstanding descriptors
> in the ring to see if any of them look suspicious.
I've added some printk()s in underrun handler. There's still some data
in the ring (tail=29, head=32), so the driver seems okay. The list of
descriptors:
tx_ring[28].ctrl=0x8000850e (used=1 wrap=0 und=0 last=1)
tx_ring[29].ctrl=0x900085ea (used=1 wrap=0 und=1 last=1) TAIL
tx_ring[30].ctrl=0x000085ea (used=0 wrap=0 und=0 last=1)
tx_ring[31].ctrl=0x0000850e (used=0 wrap=0 und=0 last=1)
tx_ring[32].ctrl=0x800085ea (used=1 wrap=0 und=0 last=1) HEAD
tx_ring[33].ctrl=0x8000850e (used=1 wrap=0 und=0 last=1)
Buffer addresses look fine, tx_ring[29..32].addr don't differ much from
the rest.
> If it's a bus latency issue, things start to get a bit
> platform-specific, so we should probably involve some more experienced
> ARM people.
Looks like I'll have to wait for upstream support of 9260, because I'm
new to ARM and I won't handle it by myself. Anyway thanks for your help.
Regards,
Wojtek
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
